Skip to Main Content duPont-Ball Library - Stetson University Library Home - duPont-Ball Library - Stetson University - Library Guides at Stetson University duPont-Ball Library - Stetson University
Header image depicting John B Stetson statue, walkway to the library, the Innovation Lab, and Student Workers

FSEMs: Fall 2025 and Spring 2026

Library research and information literacy concepts for First Year Seminar students.

Which resource should you choose?

What you need to know about each resource

Library Databases

  • Best for academic research and assignments.

  • Offers peer-reviewed articles, primary sources, eBooks, and full-text access.

  • Use advanced search tools and filters to narrow by subject, date, or source type.

  • Requires login with university credentials.

  • Results are vetted, cited, and reliable — ideal for college-level work.


Google

  • Best for general background information or locating public/government websites.

  • Can lead to primary sources (like .gov or .edu documents) with smart searching.

  • Results are ranked by popularity, not reliability.

  • Use source evaluation skills — lots of misinformation or opinion pieces appear.

  • Limited access to full academic articles — you’ll often hit a paywall.


Google Scholar

  • Great for finding academic articles, books, and citations.

  • Not everything is free — many articles are behind paywalls.

  • Search results can include preprints, predatory journals, or unreviewed work.

  • Use with library databases to get full access where available.

  • Check citations with a librarian — they may not always be accurate or complete.


Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT)

  • Best for summarizing topics, brainstorming, and drafting ideas.

  • Can help explain complex concepts in plain language.

  • Not a source — it doesn’t cite real documents unless you ask specifically, and even then citations may be incorrect.

  • Information may be outdated, biased, or just wrong — always verify.

  • Don't use it as a source unless your instructor allows it.


Wikipedia

  • Great for quick overviews and starting research.

  • Use it to understand a topic, identify keywords, and find sources listed in references.

  • Anyone can edit — so it’s not reliable for citing in academic work.

  • Good for background but not for quoting or relying on facts alone.

  • Always trace claims back to original sources listed at the bottom of the page.